A Pacific Crest Trail Quantitative Investigation of Land Management Issues

Authors

  • Marni Goldenberg California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
  • Keri Schwab California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
  • Theo Lier California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
  • June Murray California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
  • Terra Bilhorn California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2023-12071

Keywords:

Pacific Crest Trail, thru-hikers, land management, hiker education, trail angels

Abstract

The Pacific Crest Trail (PCT) is a National Scenic Trail that extends approximately 2,653 miles from the border of California and Mexico to the border of Washington State and Canada. This study examined land management and hiker issues that day, overnight, and thru-hikers experience in California while navigating the PCT in order to inform land managers. This quantitative survey, completed through Qualtrics, was disseminated to thru-hikers who completed the trail between 2017 and 2021, and individuals who used the trail for shorter durations. Survey questions focused on technology, Trail Angels, rule enforcement by land management agencies, the permitting process by the Pacific Crest Trail Association (PCTA), hiker education, and hiker demographics. Descriptive statistics were calculated and analyzed. Results indicate that most hikers prefer articles on the PCTA website, Leave No Trace (LNT) website, and certifications to gain education about the trail. They also felt that personal contacts were the most effective way to gain pre-trip education. Almost all hikers use technology on the trail, such as navigation or informational apps, emergency calls, taking photos, and listening to videos or music. More thru-hikers rely on navigational apps than day/overnight users. Many hikers felt there should be more rangers in the backcountry but also felt that social enforcement of rules is effective. Regarding Trail Angels, thru-hikers felt they were important for transportation, food/water, and shelter. Managerial implications for public land managers included a need to develop ways to educate users. This can be done in-person, online, or through signage. Increasing the presence of rangers or volunteers on the trail was also recommended, as well as developing area or jurisdiction-specific apps for information and education about trail conditions or rules. Additional education of sustainable hiking behaviors may help mitigate potential negative impacts hikers may have on the environment. Land managers must continue to assess what is currently being done and re-evaluate on an ongoing basis in order to preserve and maintain sustainable use of public lands.

References

References

Alex. (2017). Back to nature: Has technology ruined hiking?. Hillwalk Tours. Retrieved on October 06, 2021 from https://www.hillwalktours.com/walking-hiking-blog/has-technology-ruined-hiking/

Amerson, K., Rose, J., Lepp, A., & Dustin, D. (2019). Time on the trail, smartphone use, and place attachment amount Pacific Crest Trail thru-hikers. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(3), p. 308-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1680264

Beck, L., & Dustin, D. (2016). Technology on the trails. Legacy, November/December: 20-22.

Brook, P. (2016, June 7). What are all these hikers doing to the PCT? Outside Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.outsideonline.com/2087776/what-are-all-these-hikers-doing-pct

Cole, T., & Thomsen, J. M. (2021). Navigating the challenges of the multi-phase thru-hiking experience. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 13(3), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2021-V13-I3-10067

Crowley, R. (2018). Thru-hiking and why people do it. ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_theses/229

Dustin, D., Beck, L., & Rose, J. (2017) Landscape to techscape: Metamorphosis along the Pacific Crest Trail. International Journal of Wilderness, 23(1), 23-28. https://ijw.org/landscape-to-techscape/

Dustin, D., Beck, L., & Rose, J. (2018). Interpreting the Wilderness Act: A question of fidelity. International Journal of Wilderness, 24(1), 58-67. https://issuu.com/ijwilderness/docs/2018-ijw-april-final-_pages

Fasczewski, K.S., Luck, J. C., McGrath, A. H., & Elslager, T. R. (2020). “It’s not all sunshine and rainbows”: A thru-hike on the Pacific Crest Trail. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 12(3), 291-305. https://js.sagamorepub.com/jorel/

article/view/10123

Goldenberg, M., Schwab, K., Bilhorn, T., & Murray, J. (2021). A research study: Wilderness educational change on the PCT. Wilderness Education Association Conference International Virtual Conference 2021.

Goldenberg, M, Schwab, K., Bilhorn, T., & Murray, J. (2023). Sustainable land management of the Pacific Crest Trail: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 15(1), 46-60.

Ham, S. (2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose. Golden, CO: Fulcrum

Hill, M. (2019). How Tech Has Changed Hiking. Sierra Club. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/how-tech-has-changed-hiking.

Hitchner, S., Schelhas, J., Brosius, J. P., & Nibbelink, N. P. (2019). Zen and the art of the selfie stick: Blogging the John Muir Trail thru-hiking experience. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 353-365.

Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2003). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(3), 249-273.

Letcher, L., & Letcher, S. (2008). The barefoot sisters southbound. Stackpole Books.

Lee, M. (2019). Angels and echoes: An analysis of human connection and altruism on the trail. State University, New York. Undergraduate Honors Thesis. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/1413

Lepp, A., Rose, J., Amerson, K., & Dustin, D. (2021). Thru-hikers’ smartphone use on the Pacific Crest Trail. Annals of Leisure Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2021.1993286

Letcher, L., & Letcher, S. (2008). The barefoot sisters southbound. Stackpole Books.

Lum, C. S., Keith, S. J., & Scott, D. (2020). The long-distance hiking social world along the Pacific Crest Trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(2) 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1640095

Lynn, N. A., & Brown, R. D. (2003). Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(1-2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00202-5

Manning, R. E. (2003). Emerging principles for using information/education in wilderness management. International Journal of Wilderness, 9(1), 20–27. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=31ea7182a9524d98cb50b695ac2a8ac2d5fa2b14

Marion, J. L. (2014). Leave No Trace in the outdoors. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.6013

Marion, J. L., & Reid, S. E. (2007). Minimising visitor impacts to protected areas: The efficacy of low impact education programmes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(1), 5-27. doi: 10.2167/jost593.0

Martin, S. (2017). Real and potential influences of information technology on outdoor recreation and wilderness experiences and management. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 35(1), 98-101.

Molnár, A. J. (2021). Trailsigner: A conceptual model of hiking trail networks with consistent signage planning and management. Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XXXII, 333, 1. doi:10.3233/FAIA200817

Murray, J., Goldenberg, M., Schwab, K., & Billhorn, T. (2021). Thru-Hiker and land manager experiences on the PCT: Implications for local parks and open spaces. California Parks & Recreation, 77(1), 36-41.

Oates, B. (2019). For third straight year, Trump proposes massive USDA cuts. The Daily Yonder. Retrieved on October 06, 2021 from https://dailyyonder.com/third-straight-year-trump-proposes-massive-usda-cuts/2019/03/12/

Orams, M. B. (1997). The effectiveness of environmental education: Can we turn tourists into ‘greenies’? Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(4), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199712)3:4<295::AID-PTH85>3.0.CO;2-D

PCTA. (n.d.a). Agency Partners. Pacific Crest Trail Association. Retrieved on October 05, 2021 from https://www.pcta.org/our-work/partnerships/agency-partners/

PCTA. (n.d.b). Permits. Pacific Crest Trail Association. Retrieved on October 05, 2021 from https://www.pcta.org/discover-the-trail/permits/

PCTA. (n.d.c)/ History. Pacific Crest Trail Association. Retrieved on November 30, 2022 from https://www.pcta.org/about-us/history/

PCTA Visitor Use Statistics. (2021). Pacific Crest Trail Association. Retrieved September 29, 2021, from https://www.pcta.org/our-work/trail-and-land-management/pct-visitor-use-statistics/

PCTA Thru-HIker FAQ (2021) Pacific Crest Trail Association. Retrieved November 30, 2022 from https://www.pcta.org/discover-the-trail/thru-hiking-long-distance-hiking/thruhiker-faq/

Rebolo-Ifan, N., Grilli, M. G., & Lambertucci, S. A. (2019). Drones as a threat to wildlife: YouTube complements science in providing evidence about their effect. Environmental Conservation, 46(3), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000080

Rogers, A. G., & Leung, Y. F. (2020). Smarter long-distance hike: How smartphones shape information use and spatial decisions on the Appalachian Trail. International Journal of Wilderness, 26(2), 88-103. https://ijw.org/smartphones-shape-information-use-appalachian-trail/

Schwab, K., Dustin, D., & Goldenberg, M. (2019). Angels along the Pacific Crest Trail. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2019-V11-I2-8400

Shultis, J. (2012). The impact of technology on the wilderness experience: A review of common themes and approaches in three bodies of literature. In: Cole, David N., comp. Wilderness visitor experiences: Progress in research and management; 2011 April 4-7; Missoula, MT. Proc. RMRS-P-66. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station p. 110-118., 66, 110-118.

Simon, G. L., & Alagona, P. S. (2009). Beyond leave no trace. Ethics Place and Environment (Ethics, Place & Environment (Merged with Philosophy and Geography)), 12(1), 17-34.

Solomon, C. (2013, October 18). The call of the 'Wild' on the Pacific Crest Trail. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/fashion/the-call-of-Cheryl-Strayeds-Wild-on-the-pacific-crest-trail.html.

Thomsen, J. M., Fowler, J., & Lang, T. (2021). A proposed research agenda on professional and recreational drone use in National Forests and National Parks. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 39(2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2020-10509

USDA Forest Service. (1982). Comprehensive Management Plan for the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail. United States Forest Service. Retrieved on October 05, 2021 from https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/pct/land-resources-management

Wilcer, S. R., Larson, L. R., Hallo, J. C., & Baldwin, E. (2018). First Day hikers: Participation, impacts, and implications for the future. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 36, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2018-V36-I2-8403

Williams, A. (2016). The 'Wild' Effect: Meet a Hiker Inspired by Cheryl Strayed's Memoir. Condé Nast Traveler. https://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2015-02-04/the-wild-effect-how-cheryl-strayeds-memoir-inspires-hikers.

Weiler, B., Brown, T., & Curtis, J. (2008). How to influence tourists visiting protected areas to make choices that make a difference for climate change. Australian Protected Areas Congress 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/29079

Wu, C., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2021). Low-impact hiking in natural areas: A study of nature park hikers' negative impacts and on-site leave-no-trace educational program in Taiwan, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106544.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

Issue

Section

Regular Papers