Ethical Principles Associated with Inclusive Leisure Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2023-11847Keywords:
ethical principles, ethics, inclusion, inclusive leisure, leisureAbstract
To help leisure service providers act ethically, it is valuable to raise consciousness about ethics of leisure services since leisure is intimately related to ethics. Reflection on ethical principles for supporting inclusive leisure services may assist practitioners’ action. Because there is a dearth of professional papers analyzing ethical issues, especially those pertaining to leisure, and given dangers of unethical applications of various activities associated with leisure, leisure service participants and professionals need help to identify principles to address ethical situations. To respond to this need and encourage practitioners to address ethical actions, this paper proposes twelve ethical guidelines for inclusive leisure practices and policies that cluster into three categories: universal that apply to all human beings, social that pertain to modern society, and professional that focus on leisure service providers. We propose five universal ethical principles for promoting inclusive leisure. One such guideline establishes that leisure is a primary good. A second is respect for human dignity by acknowledging and facilitating freedom to pursue one’s view of the good life. Another is that social justice requires individuals to have access to basic goods and services to realize valued lives. Everyone has the right to self-determination is an additional principle. The fifth universal principle is that power is pervasive. The next four are associated with ethical principles specific to modern pluralistic societies. These principles include intersecting identities are commonplace, continuums are unavoidable, inclusion is good, and diversity is enriching. Finally, three principles relate to ethical application for leisure service providers, including that people: identify responsibilities arising from thier social positions, base inclusive leisure services on social justice, and consider perspectives different from their own. Consequently, this paper addresses twelve ethical principles for inclusive leisure that cluster into three categories: universal, social, and professional.
References
Abu-Ras, W., Suárez, Z. E., & Abu-Bader, S. (2018). Muslim Americans’ safety and well-being in the wake of Trump: A public health and social justice crisis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 88(5), 503-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ort0000321
Adichie, C. N. (June 17, 2013). The danger of a single story. TED Radio Hour. https://www.npr.org/2013/09/20/186303292/what-are-the-dangers-of-a-single-story
Alger, I., & Weibull, J. W. (2013). Homo moralis—preference evolution under incomplete information and assortative matching. Econometrica, 81(6), 2269-2302. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10637
Allen, A. (1998). Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13(1), 21- 40.
Allison, M. T. (2000). Leisure, diversity and social justice. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949876
Apel, K. O. (1993). How to ground a universalistic ethics of co-responsibility for the effects of collective actions and activities? Philosophica (Gent), 52, 9-29. doi 10.21825/philosophica.82377
Apel, K. O. (2001). The response of discourse ethics to the moral challenge of the human situation as such and especially today. Peeters.
Aristotle. (2004). The Nicomachean ethics. (J. A. K. Thomson Trans.). Penguin.
Arce-Trigatti, A. (2020). Fostering Emotional Engineers: Revisiting Constructive Thinking in Engineering Education. Journal of Multicultural Affairs, 5(1), 4, 1-19. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/jma/vol5/iss1/4
Burchardt, T., & Craig, G. (2008). Introduction. In G. Craig, T. Burchardt, & D. Gordon, D. (Eds.). Social justice and public policy: Seeking fairness in diverse societies (pp. 1-17). Policy Press.
Beatty, J., & Tolbert, W. R. (2013). Yin and Yang: The relationship of leisure and work. In T. Blackshaw (Ed.), Routledge handbook of leisure studies (pp. 469–479). Routledge.
Beatty, J. E., & Torbert, W. R. (2003). The false duality of work and leisure. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603256340
Berdinesen, H. (2017). On Hans Jonas’ “The Imperative of Responsibility.” Philosophia, 17, 16-23.
Berger, F. R. (2020). Happiness, justice, and Freedom. University of California Press.
Berger, P. L. (2014). The many altars of modernity. de Gruyter.
Blackshaw, T. (2010). Leisure. Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press
Bouwer, J., & van Leeuwen, M. (2017). Philosophy of leisure: Foundations of the good life. Routledge.
Boyd, K. A., & Goodwin, D. L. (2019). “It’s hard when people try and get their kids away from Cole”: A family’s experiences of (in) dignity in leisure settings. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 36(2), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2018-0034
Bradbury, S. (2013). Institutional racism, whiteness and the under-representation of minorities in leadership positions in football in Europe. Soccer and Society, 14(3), 296–314. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263486206
Bradford, G. K., & Sterling, M. M. (2009). The journey is the goal: The legacy of James FT Bugental. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 49(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167809334000
Braddock III, C. H. (2021). Racism and bioethics: the myth of color blindness. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(2), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1851812
Bruch, S. K., & Soss, J. (2018). Schooling as a formative political experience: Authority relations and the education of citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002195
Burls, A., & Caan, W. (2004). Social exclusion and embracement: a helpful concept?. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 5(3), 191-192. https://doi.org/10.1191/1463423604pc207xx
Coalter, F. (1998). Leisure studies, leisure policy and social citizenship: the failure of welfare or the limits of welfare?. Leisure Studies, 17(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143698375231
Coates, J. (2019). The cruel optimism of mobility: Aspiration, belonging, and the “Good Life” among transnational Chinese migrants in Tokyo. Positions Asia Critique, 27(3), 469-497. doi 10.1215/10679847-7539277
Cohen-Gewerc, E. (2017). Leisure, community, and the stranger. In K. Spracklen, B. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of leisure theory (pp. 667–682). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. Jossey-Bass.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.
Collins, S., Manninen, B. A., Gately, J. M., & Comerford, E. (Eds.). (2017). Being ethical: Classic and new voices on contemporary issues. Broadview Press.
Creighton-Smith, B. A., Cook, M., & Edginton, C. R. (2017). Leisure, ethics, and spirituality. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(5), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1295873
Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1300.
Crompton, J. L., & Wicks, B. E. (1988). Implementing a preferred equity model for the delivery of leisure services in the US context. Leisure Studies, 7(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614368800390251
Cudd, A. E. (2006). Analyzing oppression. Oxford University Press.
Dattilo, J. (2021). Inclusive leisure services: Grounded in social justice (5thedition). Sagamore-Venture.
Dattilo, J., Kleiber, D., & Williams, R. (1998). Self-determination and enjoyment enhancement: A psychologically-based service delivery model for therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 32, 258-271.
Dattilo, J., & Lopez Frias, F. J. (2021). A critical examination of leisure in modernity: Rejecting instrumentalism and embracing flourishing. Journal of Leisure Research, 52(5), 581-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1789013
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
DeLisle, L. J. (2004). Leisure and Tolerance—An Historical Perspective. World Leisure Journal, 46(2), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2004.9674358
Devine, M. A. (2021). Inclusive leisure for individuals with disabilities: Consideration of the case for social justice. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 44(2), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2021.1935414
Dill, B. T., & Zambrana, R. E. (2020). Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens. In C. R. McCann, S-K. Kim, & E. Ergun (Eds.). Feminist theory reader (pp. 108-116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001201
Felder, F. (2018). The value of inclusion. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(1), 54–70. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-9752.12280
Ferrara, A. (2019). Social freedom and reasonable pluralism: Reflections on Freedom’s Right. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(6), 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719842363
Fisk, R. P., Dean, A. M., Alkire, L., Joubert, A., Previte, J., Robertson, N., & Rosenbaum, M. S. (2018). Design for service inclusion: Creating inclusive service systems by 2050. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 834–858. doi:10.1108/JOSM-05-2018-0121
Fortune, D., & Mckeown, J. (2016). Sharing the journey: Exploring a social leisure program for persons with dementia and their spouses. Leisure Sciences, 38(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080 /01490400.2016.1157776.
Foucault, M. (2010). The archeology of knowledge. And the discourse on language. Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1990). Politics, philosophy, bulture: Interviews and other writings. Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795, doi:10.1086/448181.
Frisby, W., & Ponic, P. (2013). Sport and social inclusion. In L. Thibault & J. Harvey (Eds.), Sport policy in Canada (pp. 381–403). University of Ottawa Press.
Fullagar, S. P., & Brown, P. R. (2003). Everyday temporalities: Leisure, ethics and young women’s emotional wellbeing. Annals of Leisure Research, 6(3), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2003.10600921
Gallant, K., Smale, B., & Arai, S. (2010). Civic engagement through mandatory community service: Implications of serious leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2010.11950201
Gary, K. (2017). Neoliberal education for work versus liberal education for leisure. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(1), 83–94. doi 10.1007/s11217-016-9545-0
Goodin, R. E. (1996). Inclusion and exclusion. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie/Europäisches Archiv Für Soziologie, 37(2), 343–371.
Fox, K. (2006). Leisure and indigenous peoples. Leisure Studies, 25(4), 403-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360600896502
Garside, N., Lavery, J., & Wells, C. (2019). Life examined: Foundational themes in ethical and socio-political thought. Broadview Press.
Gary, K. (2017). Neoliberal education for work versus liberal education for leisure. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9545-0
Glover, T.D. (2017). Leisure, social space, and belonging. In K. Spracklen, B. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.). The Palgrave handbook of leisure theory (pp. 873–890.) Palgrave.
Green, E. (1998). Women doing friendship: An analysis of women’s leisure as a site of identity construction, empowerment and resistance. Leisure Studies, 17, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143698375114
Haidt J., & Kesebir S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797-832). Wiley.
Hall, J. M., & Carlson, K. (2016). Marginalization. Advances in Nursing Science, 39(3), 200-215. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000123
Heimo, O. I., Harviainen, J. T., Kimppa, K. K., & Mäkilä, T. (2018). Virtual to virtuous money: A virtue ethics perspective on video game business logic. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3408-z
Henderson, K. A. (2014). The imperative of leisure justice research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2014.916971.
Hicks, D. (2011). Dignity: The essential role it plays in resolving conflict. Yale University Press.
Holba, A. M. (2007). Philosophical leisure: Recuperative practice for human communication (No. 55). Marquette University Press.
Hutchinson, S. L., & Samdahl, D. M. (2000). Reflections on the “voice of authority” in leisure research and practice. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 23(1), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2000.10715611
Isham, A., Gatersleben, B., & Jackson, T. (2019). Flow activities as a route to living well with less. Environment and Behavior, 51(4), 431-461. doi: I0.l 177/0013916518799826
Iwasaki, Y. (2008). Pathways to meaning-making through leisure-like pursuits in global contexts. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(2), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2008.11950139
Jo, K. K. (2019). Learning to rest: A Pieperian approach to leisure in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(2), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12344
Joseph, J., & Kriger, D. (2021). Towards a decolonizing kinesiology ethics model. Quest, 73(2), 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.1898996
Kelly, J. R. (2019). Freedom to be: A new sociology of leisure. Routledge.
Kelly, J. R. (1987). Possessing leisure. World Leisure & Recreation, 29(3), 12–16. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10261133.1987.10559001
Kjølsrød, L. (2019). Leisure as source of knowledge, social resilience and public commitment: Specialized play. Springer.
Langlois, A. J. (2009). Human rights universalism. In P. Hayden (Ed.). The Ashgate Research Companion to Ethics and International Relations (pp. 201- 214). Ashgate.
Layland, E. K., Hill, B. J., & Nelson, L. J. (2018). Freedom to explore the self: How emerging adults use leisure to develop identity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1374440
Liljeblad, J. (2015). Using Foucault to construct normative guidelines for an ethics of tourist–indigenous encounters. Tourist Studies, 15(1), 65-85. doi: 10.1177/1468797614550957
Little, C., DeLeeuw, R. R., Andriana, E., & Zanuttini, J. (2020). Social inclusion through the eyes of the student: Perspectives from students with disabilities on friendship and acceptance. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1837352
Lopez Frias, F. J., & Dattilo, J. (2021). The influence of power on leisure: Implications for inclusive leisure services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 2220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052220
Lopez Frias, F. J., & Dattilo, J. (2020). The synergy of the social justice and inclusion leisure continuum. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-020-00059-y
Lopez Frias, F. J., & Gimeno Monfort, X. (2019). Utopia and the meaning of life: ludic reason versus instrumental reason in Bernard Suits’ work. International Journal of Play, 8(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2019.1643977
Lovelock, B. (2017). Introduction to special issue: ethics and leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(5), 519-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1391463
MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Open Court.
Marín-López, I., Zych, I., Monks, C. P., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019). Empathy, morality and social and emotional competencies in interpersonal interactions online. Thriving in Digital Workspaces, 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24463-7_11
McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038455
McKee, R. (1997). Story: style, structure, substance, and the principles of screenwriting. HarperCollins.
McLean, D. (2017). Speaking of virtue ethics: what has happened to leisure?. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(5), 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1357046
McLean, D. J., & Yoder, D. G. (2005). Issues in recreation and leisure: Ethical decision making. Human Kinetics.
Morgan, W. J. (2006). Philosophy and physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of physical education (pp. 97–108). Routledge.
Mowatt, R. (2022). Revised notes from a leisure son: Expanding an understanding of White supremacy in leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 25(2), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2020.1768876
Moyo, D. (2018). Edge of chaos: Why democracy is failing to deliver economic growth- and how to fix it. Basic Books.
Mulvey, A., Terenzio, M., Hill, J., Bond, M. A., Huygens, I., Hamerton, H. R., Cahill, S. (2000). Stories of relative privilege: Power and social change in feminist community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 883–911. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005120001986
National Recreation and Parks Association (2018). Parks and recreation inclusion report. www.nrpa.org
Nguyen, V. T. (2016, July 11–18). The immigrant’s fate is everyone’s. Time, 188(2–3), 38–39.
Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Lonsdale, C., & Williams, G. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 214-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529
Park, J. (1999). Becoming more authentic: The positive side of existentialism. Existential Books.
Porter, H., Iwasaki, Y., & Shank, J. (2010). Conceptualizing meaning-making through leisure experiences. Society and Leisure, 33(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2010.10707808
Prout, A. (2011). Taking a step away from modernity: Reconsidering the new sociology of childhood. Global studies of childhood, 1(1), 4-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.4
Radway, J. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill Press.
Ramirez, E. J., & LaBarge, S. (2018). Real moral problems in the use of virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(4), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9473-5
Rawls, J. (1997). Social unity and primary goods. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.). Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 276-280). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611964.010
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2018). Sociocultural influences on student motivation as viewed through the lens of self-determination theory. In G. A. D. Liem & D. M. McInery. Big theories revisited, 2, (pp. 15-40). Information Age Publishing.
Rosenblum, K. E., & Travis, T. C. (2016). The meaning of difference: American construction of race, ethnicity, sex and gender, social class, sexuality, and disability. McGraw-Hill Education.
Rojek, C. (2017). The case of Belle Gibson, social media, and what it means for understanding leisure under digital praxis. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(5), 524-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1290142
Rosling, H., Rosling, O., & Ronnlund, A. R. (2018). Factfulness: Ten reasons we’re wrong about the world – and why things are better than you think. Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.
Sacks, J. (2002). The dignity of difference: How to avoid the clash of civilizations. Bloomsbury.
Santos, H. M., da Silva, S. M., & Menezes, I. (2018). From liberal acceptance to intolerance: discourses on sexual diversity in schools by portuguese young people. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 17(1), 55-65. doi 10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v17-i1-1655
Schultz, C. S., & McKeown, J. K. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Toward “digital leisure studies.” Leisure Sciences, 40(4), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1441768
Schwandt, T. A. (2018). Acting together in determining value: A professional ethical responsibility of evaluators. Evaluation, 24(3), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018781362
Scott, K., Rowe, F., & Pollock, V. (2018). Creating the good life? A wellbeing perspective on cultural value in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.001
Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.
Sen, A. (2011). The idea of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shen, X. S., & Yarnal, C. (2010). Blowing open the serious leisure-casual leisure dichotomy: what's in there?. Leisure Sciences, 32(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400903547179
Skidelsky, E., & Skidelsky, R. (2012). How much is enough?: money and the good life. Penguin UK.
Simpson, S. (2003). The leader who is hardly known: Self-less teaching from the Chinese tradition. Wood ‘N’ Barnes.
Son, J. S. (2018). Marginalization in leisure and health resources in a rural US town: Social justice issues related to age, race, and class. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 1(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-017-0001-7
Sparkman, T. E. (2019). Exploring the boundaries of diversity and inclusion in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 18(2), 173-195. doi: 10.1177/1534484319837030
Spracklen, K. (2009). The meaning and purpose of leisure: Habermas and leisure at the end of modernity. Palgrave Macmillan
Stewart, W. C., Seiple, C., & Hoover, D. R. (2020). Toward a Global Covenant of Peaceable Neighborhood: Introducing the Philosophy of Covenantal Pluralism. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 18(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2020.1835029
Sylvester, C. D. (1987). The ethics of play, leisure, and recreation in the twentieth century, 1900–1983. Leisure Sciences, 9(3), 173-187. doi: 10.1080/01490408709512158
Tang, M., Wang, D., & Guerrien, A. (2020). A systematic review and meta‐analysis on basic psychological need satisfaction, motivation, and well‐being in later life: Contributions of self‐determination theory. PsyCh Journal, 9(1), 5-33. doi: 10.1002/pchj.293
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
Teschers, C. (2017). Education and Schmid’s Art of Living: Philosophical, psychological and educational perspectives on living a good life. Routledge.
Theriault, D. (2019). Power threats and radical healing in black youths’ leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(5), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1633570
Trussell, D. E. (2018). Families as agents of social change and justice in communities through leisure and sport experiences. Annals of Leisure Research, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1407661
UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UN.
VanderWeele, T. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(31), 8148–8156. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1702996114
Veal, A. J. (2001). Leisure, culture and lifestyle. Loisir et société/Society and Leisure, 24(2), 359-376. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/000187ar
Veal, T. (1998). Leisure studies, pluralism and social democracy. Leisure Studies, 17(4), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/026143698375097
Velez, G., & Spencer, M. B. (2018). Phenomenology and intersectionality. In C. E. Santos & R. B. Toomey (Eds.), Envisioning the integration of an intersectional lens in developmental science. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 161, 75–90.
Wallace, C., & Alt, R. (2001). Youth cultures under authoritarian regimes: The case of swings against the Nazis. Youth & Society, 32, 275–302.
Watkins, M., & Bond, C. (2007). Ways of experiencing leisure. Leisure sciences, 29(3), 287-307. doi: 10.1080/01490400701259985
Watson, B., & Scraton, S. J. (2013). Leisure studies and intersectionality. Leisure Studies, 32(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2012.707677
Williams, J. P., & Schwarz, K. C. (2021). Studies on the social construction of identity and authenticity. Routledge.
Wise, J. B. (2018). Integrating leisure, human flourishing, and the capabilities approach: Implications for therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 52(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.18666/TRJ-2018-V52-I3-8479
Yuen, F., & Fortune, D. (2019). Leisure, art, and advocacy: Opportunities for Conscientizaçao, contentious dialogue, and social justice. Leisure Sciences, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1604276,10.1080/01490400.2019.1604276.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2010). Theorizing identity: Beyond the ‘us’ and ‘them’ dichotomy. Patterns of prejudice, 44(3), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2010.489736
Zick, A., Küpper, B., & Hövermann, A. (2011). Intolerance, prejudice and discrimination: A European report. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
Author Representations
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.