Reflecting on the Parks and Recreation Implications of Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) v. Edge Fitness, LLC, et al.

Authors

  • Erik Smith Florida State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2023-12086

Keywords:

recreation, fitness center, gymtimidation, harassment, sport law, Public Accommodation Act

Abstract

In Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) v. Edge Fitness, LLC, et al., two male patrons located in Connecticut filed complaints arguing that their gyms’ “women only” workout areas were a discriminatory practice. The gyms argued a gender privacy exception was present in the law, but the Connecticut Supreme Court ultimately disagreed. While the legal implications have been examined (Leudman, 2021), the parks and recreation managerial implications have not been discussed. Women’s only spaces are built into many modern fitness facility models and seeing them challenged may open the door to confusion and frustration from patrons. The purpose of this commentary is to reflect on the significance of CHRO v. Edge Fitness, LLC, et al. to parks and recreation spaces and the perspective parks and recreation practitioners can take into the future to reduce cases such as CHRO v. Edge Fitness, LLC, et al. 

References

Arikawa, A. D., O’Dougherty, M., & Schmitz, K. H. (2011). Adherence to a strength training intervention in adult women. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8(1), 111–118. Https://Doi.Org/10.1123/Jpah.8.1.111

Barrett, D. (2021). Brief of amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut. Connecticut Supreme Court. SC 20538.

Barry, K. M. (2021). Brief of amicus curiae in support of the plaintiff-appellant. Supreme Court of the State of Connecticut. S.C. 20538.

Bartschi, K. J. (2021). Amicus brief of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Lambda Legal Education & Defense Fund, Inc., and Connecticut Transadvocacy Coalition. State of Connecticut Supreme Court. SC 20538.

Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) v. Edge Fitness, LLC, et al. 342 Conn. 25 (Conn. 2022) 268 A.3d 630.

Coulter., K. S. (2021). Intimidation and distraction in an exercise context. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(4), 668–686. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/1612197X.2020.1739108

Craig, M. L., & Liberti, R. (2007). “Cause that’s what girls do”: The making of a feminized gym. Gender & Society, 21(5), 676–699. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0891243207306382

Ekemezie, C. (2021, October 8). The appeal and the shortcomings of women-only gyms. Vox. https://www.vox.com/22709598/women-only-gyms-curves-gender-trans

Friedman, D. (2022). Let's get physical: How women discovered exercise and reshaped the world. G.P. Putnam's Sons.

García-Fernández, J., Gálvez-Ruíz, P., Fernández-Gavira, J., Vélez-Colón, L., Pitts, B., & Bernal-García, A. (2018). The effects of service convenience and perceived quality on perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty in low-cost fitness centers. Sport Management Review, 21(3), 250–262. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Smr.2017.07.003

Klein, L. B., & Martin, S. L. (2021). Sexual harassment of college and university students: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(4), 777–792. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1524838019881731

Leudman, R. (2021). Asserting the religious freedom of your customers: Free “exercise” and the curious case of CHRO v. Edge Fitness (April 9, 2021). Northeastern University Law Review Forum (2021). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3834882

Prichard, I., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). Relations among exercise type, self-objectification, and body image in the fitness centre environment: The role of reasons for exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(6), 855-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.10.005

Polyakova, O., & Ramchandani, G. (2020). Perceived service quality among regular users of gyms in public sports centres in the UK. Managing Sport and Leisure, 28(1), 35–54. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1853594

Public Accommodation Act, CT General Statutes § 46a-64 (2012).

Rana, J. (2018). Ladies-only!: Empowerment and comfort in gender-segregated kickboxing in the Netherlands. In A. Ratna & S. F. Samie (Eds.), Race, gender, sport. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315637051-8.

Ryu, J. (2022, February 26). Some women are sick of being harassed at gyms. Are women's-only gyms fixing the problem? USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2022/02/26/womens-only-gyms-problem-experts-weigh-in/6908809001/

Sandler, E. M., & Karpman, M. (2021). Brief of the amici curiae, Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford, Muslim Coalition of Connecticut, and other religious organizations (the “Interfaith Amici”). Supreme Court of the State of Connecticut. S.C. 20538.

Schvey, N, A., Sbrocco, T., Bakalar, J. L., Ress, R., Barmine, M., Gorlick, J., Pine, A., Stephens, M., & Tanofsky-Kraff, M. (2017). The experience of weight stigma among gym members with overweight and obesity. Stigma and Health (Washington, D.C.), 2(4), 292–306. Https://Doi.Org/10.1037/Sah0000062

Turnock, L. A. (2021). “There’s a difference between tolerance and acceptance’: Exploring women’s experiences of barriers to access in UK gyms. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 2, 100049. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Wss.2021.100049

Wilson, P. M., Mack, D. E., & Grattan, K. P. (2008). Understanding motivation for exercise: A self-determination theory perspective. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 250–256. Https://Doi.Org/10.1037/A0012762

Published

2023-10-07

Issue

Section

Commentary