Classifying Rural Parks: A Case Study in Iowa

Authors

  • Hans Klein-Hewett Iowa State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2024-12245

Keywords:

rural, park planning, classification system, quality of life, outdoor recreation

Abstract

Many park professionals use classification systems to describe how parks function within their context. The most common classification system used in the United States is the National Recreation and Parks Association’s Parks, Open Space, and Pathways Classification System, which uses park size, location, and walkability as determinants of a park’s class. While those variables are important in urban spaces, they are not always applicable to rural areas. This means that rural parks are not fully understood and are evaluated by urbanormative assumptions. Using park data in an eight-county rural study area in central Iowa, this paper proposes a new Rural Park Classification System, which features 14 park classes organized into two broad categories based on their dependence on the natural environment. The Rural Park Classification System aims to start a dialog about rural park use and function so rural park professionals can study, design, and manage rural parks with a higher level of precision. The impacts of the classification system are many, including an expanded and rural-focused park lexicon that allows park managers and park planners to better discuss and understand the network of parks within an area. Additionally, the proposed classification system, being centered on park function and constituent services, was constructed explicitly to aid in conversations between park managers and administrators/legislators. 

Published

2024-08-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper