National Park Service Internal Structures Toward Agency Resilience: A Mixed-Methods, Multi-Site, Mesoscale Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2024-12293Keywords:
National Park Service, social capital, homophily, precursor resilience, social network analysisAbstract
A park and recreation agency’s internal capacity building is vital toward enhancing its resilience. Yet, internal capacity-building is often underemphasized as agencies attend to external relationships. This omission can lessen the ability of an agency to respond nimbly to long-standing needs and emergent opportunities. Specifically, relationships among groups within an agency – what is deemed the intra-organizational mesoscale between individuals and whole organizations – can increase an agency’s ability to meet goals efficiently, building resilience through increased knowledge and social capital. The U.S. National Park Service (NPS) adopted this mesoscale in their Urban Agenda goal of One NPS, or building resilience-focused, agency-wide internal connections. We investigated intra-organizational group relationships in this context, examining relationships within (i.e., bonds) and across (i.e., bridges) three groups found in the NPS and commonly in other park and recreation agencies: parks, programs, and offices. Pairing qualitative interviews with quantitative social network analysis in Detroit, Tucson, and Boston, we examined the relative prevalence of relationships alongside present and potential supports and opportunities. These three urban areas exemplify different proximities to national park units, which are the typical face of the NPS, plus they each have programs and offices. Findings suggest that across these urban areas, parks tend to favor bonds and programs tend to favor bridges, with offices playing a supporting role to both. To further build resilience, cultivating bridges is key, especially with programs (i.e., park-program and office-program efforts and connections). This investigation may inform a more strategic focusing of an agency’s limited resources. We highlight five directions for managerial consideration toward this aim: build local bridges, especially with programs; consider heterogeneity with the “programs” group (or how programs appear to be more dissimilar from each other than do those in the parks or offices groups); reflect on parks’ centrality to NPS identity and relationships; seek organizational structures supportive of relationship development; and examine the mesoscale for resilience. These directions for strategic focusing of organizational resources are based in the long-standing work of the NPS but ultimately transcend this single agency, providing targeted guidance for park and recreation organizations in their internal capacity-building toward external, public-oriented goals.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact gbates@sagamorepub.com for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
Author Representations
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.