Competency Development for Board Members in Public Park and Recreation Agencies
Keywords:
Boards, competencies, delphi, jurors, public parks and recreation, nonprofits.Abstract
This study sought to identify the competencies that board members in public parks and recreation agencies perceived as necessary to perform their duties. Competencies were defined as skills, knowledge, and characteristics needed to perform the duties of a board member. A systems theoretical framework guided the development of competencies. Systems theory has been used extensively in organizational development for many years and asserts that organizations are interdependent systems that rely on subsystems to achieve stability. When one part of the system is weak, it weakens the entire system. In public parks and recreation, board members are a major part of the organization, and their performance is pivotal to the effectiveness of the agency. The board influences all policies, services, and practices within an agency. Given this power and potential impact, a high performing board is imperative. Competencies may be the key to improving the performance of boards in public parks and recreation agencies.
A Delphi technique was used to collect data, and potential jurors were randomly selected from the National Recreation and Park Association’s Citizen Board Member Branch. A total of 23 jurors completed three rounds of data collection. They were asked to list the competencies they perceived as important for board members, rank the importance of the generated competencies to board members, determine if the developed competency categories were accurate, and determine if the competencies were assigned to the appropriate category. Based on the results of the Delphi process, the Board Member Competency Framework was developed. It consists of eight general competency categories and 56 specific competencies. The eight general competency categories included (a) advocacy, (b) board effectiveness, (c) community relations, (d) decision making, (e) education and experience, (f) finance and planning, (g) interpersonal characteristics, and (h) staff relations. There were nine competencies rated as extremely important. The highest rated competencies included (a) study issues before making decisions, (b) participate in committee and board meetings, (c) understand the purpose of the board, and (d) have the ability to make decisions. Given systems theory, the determined competencies serve as a framework for the development of training and procedures to aid board members in improving their performance which will ultimately impact the overall agency.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact gbates@sagamorepub.com for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
Author Representations
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.