Using the Benefits Continuum, Enterprise Funds, and Cost Finding to Implement Best Pricing Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2016-V34-I4-7358Keywords:
Price, park and recreation services, benefits continuum, cost finding, enterprise fundsAbstract
The paper reports how best practices in pricing recreation and aquatic facilities and services suggested by the research literature were implemented in a city of 100,000. The process had three core elements.
First, in order to price each service at a level that was fair and equitable to both participants and nonparticipants, a benefits continuum was developed. This categorized each service into one of five categories. Services perceived to provide communitywide benefits were fully subsidized from taxes, so no price was charged for them. At the other extreme, when all benefits were perceived to accrue to users a price was set that covered all of its costs. The magnitude of spillover benefits that a community receives varies among services, so three position points were shown on the continuum reflecting services where benefits accrued primarily to the community (25% cost recovery), equally to users and the community (50%), and primarily to the users (75%).
The second element was the implementation of enterprise-like funds for all services that generated revenues. However, the technical definition of enterprise funds as being self-financing was qualified by the council, because it approved transfer of money from the general fund which was intended to subsidize economically disadvantaged users of the enterprise services.
Prices designed to produce revenues that achieve rationally derived cost-recovery targets and create viable enterprise funds are dependent upon there being reasonably accurate estimates of service costs, since revenue goals without accurately estimating costs are meaningless. Accordingly, a cost finding exercise was undertaken which involved taking available financial data and recasting and adjusting it to derive cost estimates. Full absorption costing was used that embraced four types of costs: citywide administration indirect costs, department indirect costs, division indirect costs, and direct variable costs. The resultant cost based prices were then adjusted to reflect the going rate for each service charged by other suppliers in the area.
The perceived advantages and challenges encountered in this process are discussed along with the managerial implications. Agencies tend to make price changes reactively in response to an emergent financial or political imperative. However, strategic pricing requires proactively developing a policy. This case study describes a proactive approach that provides strong conceptual scaffolding upon which to construct an effective pricing policy.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact gbates@sagamorepub.com for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
Author Representations
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.