A Methodological Evaluation of an Environmental Education Survey: Is There a Technological Advantage
Keywords:environmental education, survey methods, nature
AbstractEnvironmental education represents a conceivable way to counter the effects of youth’s lack of exposure to the natural environment. However, the effectiveness of these programs is often not evaluated, and when they are, the methods for doing so are not consistent. Without proper and reliable methods of data collection, the results may be inaccurate and lead to false claims. Middle school children were given surveys to measure interest in nature, importance of nature, and environmental stewardship. The students were split into two groups, one that took the survey through a conventional pencil-and-paper method and one that took the survey on a tablet computer (e.g., iPad). The results revealed a difference in how students responded based on how they took the survey. Children may be more willing to provide more truthful responses through digital means and may associate paper surveys with exams or other less desirable activities.Subscribe to JOREL
DCohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles: Implications for investments in faculty and technology. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 15.1-15.22). Boulder, CO.
Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2007). Design effects in the transition to webbased surveys. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 32(5), 90-96.
Hoaglin, D.C. & Iglewicz, B. (1987). Fine-Tuning some resistant rules for outlier labelling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(400), 1147-1149.
Hoaglin, D.C., Iglewicz, B. & Tukey, J.W. (1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of American Statistical Association, 81(396), 991-999.
Hohwu, L., Lyshol, H., Jonsson, S.H., Petzold, M. & Obel, C. (2013). Web-based versus traditional paper questionariies: A mixed-mode survey with a nordic perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8).
Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Larson, L.R., Castleberry, S.B., & Green, G.T. (2010). Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethic groups. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3), 95-113.
Larson, L.R., Green, G.T., & Castleberry, S.B. (2009). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure environmental orientations in a diverse group of children. Environment and Behavior, 43(1).
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065-1078.
Pergams, O. R. W., & Zaradic, P. A. (2006). Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management, 80, 387-393.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Smith-Sebasto, N. J., & Cavern, L. (2006). Effects of pre- and post-trip activities associated with a residential environmental education experience on students' attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(4), 3- 17.
Vondanovich, S., Shen, K. & Sundaram, D. (2015). Social competence of digital natives: Impact of social networking sites (SNS) use. AMCIS Proceedings, Association for Information Systems, 1-9.
Wilcox, A.B., Gallagher, K.D., Boden-Albala, & B. Bakken, S.R. (2012). Research data collection methods: From paper to tablet computers. Medical Care, 50.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.