The Neuroscience of Self-Efficacy: Vertically Integrated Leisure Theory and Its Implications for Theory-Based Programming

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2018-V10-I2-7606

Keywords:

vertical integration, theory, theory-based programming, neuroscience, leisure research

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explain and establish a link between social-psychological and biological explanations of self-efficacy theory. Specifically, the paper uses a hypothetical rock climbing program to illustrate how a practitioner could enhance the four sources of self-efficacious beliefs (enactive attainment, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological state), in a way that would increase the likelihood of releasing four risk/reward brain chemicals (dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, and endorphin) while decreasing the likelihood of releasing the stress hormone cortisol. By understanding and applying self-efficacy theory at the social-psychological and biological levels—a process called vertical integration—practitioners could improve program implementation and evaluation, thereby enhancing the overall outcomes of their programs. Furthermore, adoption of a vertically integrated self-efficacy theory could help bridge the research–practice gap.Subscribe to JOREL

Author Biography

Garrett Anderson Stone, Clemson University

Garrett is a PhD student in the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Managment at Clemson University with a Bachelors of Science in Recreation Therapy and a Master's of Science in Youth and Family Recreation, both earned at Brigham Young University. He has experience developing activities and interventions in youth treatment settings and has worked as a therapeutic guide. Currently, his research is focused on critical pedagogy, experiential education, and educational travel.

References

Baldwin, C. K. (2000). Theory, program, and outcomes: Assessing the challenges of evaluating at-risk youth recreation programs. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 18(1), 19-33.

Baldwin, C. K., Hutchinson, S. L., & Magnuson, D. R. (2004). Program theory: A framework for theory-driven programming and evaluation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 38(1), 16-31.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606

Barkow, J. H. (Ed.). (2006a). Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130027.001.0001

Barkow, J. H. (2006b). Vertical/compatible integration versus analogizing with biology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(4), 348-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06239086

Berg, K. (2010). Justifying physical education based on neuroscience evidence. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(3), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598445

Biglan, A. (1987). A behavior-analytic critique of Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. The Behavior Analyst, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392402

Bobilya, A. J., & Poff, R. A. (2013). Advancing theory and improving practice: Editors' notes. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 5(3), 177-178. https://doi.org/10.7768/1948-5123.1227

Breuning, L. G. (2012). Meet your happy chemicals. Lexington, KY: System Integrity Press.

Browne, L., Hough, M., & Schwab, K. (2009). Scaffolding: A promising approach to fostering critical thinking. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 24, 114-119. http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/rpta_fac/45

Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211

Duerden, M. D., Taniguchi, S., & Widmer, M. (2012). Antecedents of identity development in a structured recreation setting a qualitative inquiry. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411417869

Edwards, D. H., & Kravitz, E. A. (1997). Serotonin, social status and aggression. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7(6), 812-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80140-7

Ewert, A., Davidson, C., & Chang, Y. (2016). The body doesn’t lie: Measuring stress in adventure recreation activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(4), 327-337. http://js.sagamorepub.com/.../187

Hemingway, J. L., & Parr, M. G. W. (2000). Leisure Research and Leisure Practice: Three Perspectives on Constructing the Research? Practice Relation. Leisure Sciences, 22(3), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950121834

Henderson, K. A. (1994). Theory application and development in recreation, parks, and leisure research. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12(1), 51-64.

Henderson, K. A., Presley, J., & Bialeschki, M. D. (2004). Theory in recreation and leisure research: Reflections from the editors. Leisure Sciences, 26(4), 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400490502471

Hurd, A. R., Barcelona, R. J., & Meldrum, J. T. (2008). Leisure services management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Johnson, L. (2014). Cross curricular connections in elementary physical education. Missouri Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 24, 14-21.

Krueger, F., Parasuraman, R., Iyengar, V., Thornburg, M., Weel, J., Lin, M., & Lipsky, R. H. (2012). Oxytocin receptor genetic variation promotes human trust behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00004

Lewin, K. (1945). The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8, 126-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2785233

Madrigal, R. (1999). Comment on the impact of leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1999.11949862

Mayo Clinic (2017). Chronic stress puts your health at risk. Retrieved from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/stress-management/in-depth/stress/art-20046037.

More, T. A., & Averill, J. R. (2003). The structure of recreation behavior. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(4), 372-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2003.11950002

Ogden, J. (2003). Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis. Health Psychology, 22(4), 424-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424

O’Reilly, R. C., Hazy, T. E., Mollick, J., Mackie, P., & Herd, S. (2014). Goal-driven cognition in the brain: A computational framework. [In-press] 1-63.

Parr, M. G. (1996). The relationship between leisure theory and recreation practice. Leisure Sciences, 18(4), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409609513291

Pessiglione, M., Seymour, B., Flandin, G., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behavior in humans. Nature, 442(7106), 1042-1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05051

Sharma, A., Sood, A., Dhiman, N., & Pradesh, U. (2014). Endorphin: Natural pain killer. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3(3), 341-350.

Steyn, F., & Louw, D. (2012). Recreation intervention with adolescent offenders: Prospects and challenges in the South African context. African Journal for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 18(2), 423-433. http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC123239

Sutton, R. I. (2002). Weird ideas that work: 11½ practices for promoting, managing, and sustaining innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.

Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486-489. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308370

Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). A sniff of trust: Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on face recognition, trust to in-group, and trust to out-group. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(3), 438-443. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.008

Walsh, A. (1997). Methodological individualism and vertical integration in the social sciences. Behavior and Philosophy, 25(2), 121-136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759372

Wells, S. M., Widmer, M. A., & McCoy, J. K. (2004). Grubs and grasshoppers: Challenge‐based recreation and the collective efficacy of families with at‐risk youth. Family Relations, 53(3), 326-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2003.0009.x

Weisfeld, G. E. (2002). Neural and functional aspects of pride and shame. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing. http://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.0197-6664.2003.0009.x

Widmer, M. A., Duerden, M. D., & Taniguchi, S. T. (2014). Increasing and generalizing self-efficacy: The effects of adventure recreation on the academic efficacy of early adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950318

Williams, D. M. (2010). Outcome expectancy and self-efficacy: Theoretical implications of an unresolved contradiction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310368802

Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge (Vol. 31). London, UK: Vintage Books.

Published

2018-05-08

Issue

Section

Research Note