Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Immersive Technology and Nature Connection

John Cameron Sneed, S. Anthony Deringer, Adam Hanley

Keywords


Nature connection; virtual; conservation; virtual reality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahn, S. J. G., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K. L., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing Nature: Embodying Animals in Immersive Virtual Environments Increases Inclusion of Nature in Self and Involvement With Nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173

Calogiuri, G., Litleskare, S., Fagerheim, K. A., Rydgren, T. L., Brambilla, E., & Thurston, M. (2018). Experiencing nature through immersive virtual environments: Environmental perceptions, physical engagement, and affective responses during a simulated nature walk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JAN), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02321

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

Dolliver, K., Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., & Bruehlman-Senecal, E. (2009). Why Is Nature Beneficial?: The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745

Heeter, C. (2015). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262

Johnson, C. D. L. (2018). Using virtual reality and 360-degree video in the religious studies classroom: An experiment. Teaching Theology and Religion, 21(3), 228–241.

Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods : Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.

Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. P. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001

Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating Nearby Nature. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418527

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). With nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748

Obery, A., & Bangert, A. (2017). Exploring the Influence of nature relatedness and perceived science knowledge on proenvironmental behavior. Education Sciences, 7(1), 17.

Pyle, R. M. (2003). Nature matrix: Reconnecting people and nature. Oryx, 37(2), 206–214.

Salamon, N., Grimm, J. M., Horack, J. M., & Newton, E. K. (2018). Application of virtual reality for crew mental health in extended-duration space missions. Acta Astronautica, 146(September), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.02.034

Saroglou, V., Buxant, C., & Tilquin, J. (2008). Positive emotions as leading to religion and spirituality. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(3), 165–173.

Shultz, P. W. (2001). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. (pp. 61–78). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4

Soliman, M., Peetz, J., & Davydenko, M. (2017). The impact of immersive technology on nature relatedness and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(1), 8–17.

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2020-V12-I2-9871

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Sagamore Publishing LLC