Editorial Policies

Section Policies

Invited Papers

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Regular Papers

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Programs That Work

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Research Notes

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue: Social Justice Issues in Parks and Recreation

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue: Marketing Leisure with Diverse Populations

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Book Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Lessons from the Legends

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Commentary

This section is intended to provide a forum for recreation, park, and leisure educators, scholars, and professionals to share their perspectives and opinions on pressing issues facing park and recreation management and administration. Commentary authors should have in-depth knowledge of the topic and be eager to present a viewpoint on existing challenges, concepts, and prevalent notions related to research and practice. Submitted commentaries will undergo a peer-review process coordinated by the section editor, and acceptance criteria includes clarity and coherence of the author(s) position, the soundness of the argument, and reviewer judgment with regards to the contribution to the field. Commentary articles do not follow a strict structure but should have an introduction, a few body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Commentary articles should be no longer than 1,500 words (includes cited sources) and should not contain any figures or tables. Prior to submission, authors are requested to initially submit a brief outline of the key points proposed for the commentary to the Section Editor.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue: NERR 2019

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue: Innovative Methodologies in Park and Recreation Management

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Listed below are the steps of the review process for manuscripts.

  1. Manuscripts received in the editor's office are initially reviewed to determine if the subject matter falls within the general boundaries of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. Papers are also checked against the guidelines for contributors to determine if other requirements have been met. 
  2. If a manuscript passes these initial tests, it is sent to an associate editor whose background, experience, and interest match the content of the manuscript.
  3. The associate editor then conducts their own review and also seeks two reviewers.
  4. A maximum of six-eight weeks is allowed for this portion of the review process. After receiving reviews from two outside reviewers, the associate editor prepares a letter to the editor recommending disposition of the manuscript.
  5. When the associate editor completes the review, all copies of the manuscript, the review forms, and comment sheets will be returned to the editor with a cover letter recommending disposition. Manuscripts are the property of the author until they are published in the journal.
  6. Upon return of all materials, the editor reviews the recommendations of the associate editor and the additional reviewers. Based upon their suggestions, the number of manuscripts awaiting publication, and other logistical concerns, the editor will write the author indicating the manuscript falls into one of the following categories:
    • Accept for publication as is (which happens very infrequently).
    • Accept, but return to the author for minor revisions.
    • Accept, but return to author for major revisions.
    • Invite author to revise and resubmit for further review before a public decision is made. If the manuscript is resubmitted, it will be sent to the original associate editor for further review.
    • Rejected outright. The author is advised not to resubmit the manuscript.

 

Publication Frequency

Q1 - March 16
Q2 - June 15
Q3 - September 24
Q4 - December 28

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...