Two Sides of the Coin: Volunteer Coaches and Sport Clubs’ Ideological Psychological Contract
Keywords:volunteer coaches, community sport, psychological contract, ideological psychological contract
AbstractCommunity sport and recreation organizations (CSROs) are woven into the fabric of many local communities. CSROs play an integral role in not only providing recreational and competitive sport, but also act as conduits that may contribute to positive outcomes such as mental health benefits and economic and social capital. Though the importance of CSROs is often recognized, their ability to recruit and retain volunteer coaches, who are integral to their mission, continues to be troublesome. The retention of volunteer coaches may leave CSROs programs imperiled. Psychological contracts are shown to impact volunteers’ attitudes and behaviours, and as such may be a critical piece to the volunteer coach retention puzzle. As such, the purpose of this study was to use an ideological psychological contract (iPC) framework to explore the value-based expectations of volunteer coaches and the administrators who represent their club. The values-based expectations of volunteer coaches, and their respective clubs was uncovered through a multiple case study of two soccer clubs. Findings revealed that both coaches and clubs possess values-based expectations of themselves and the other party. While coaches and clubs did express some shared values, each also identified unique values. The findings of this study suggest several implications for managers. Managers of CSROs may wish to develop a clear set of values for their organization, and explicitly identify how those values are to be embodied by coaches. The latter point may reduce misunderstandings, and therefore incongruence of expectations between volunteer coaches and CSROs. Underpinning organizational actions and communications in value-based expectations further exemplifies how expectations are to be brought to life, for example, ensuring that decision making reflects the CSROs values, and when members of the CSRO deviate from identified values, corrective measures are taken. Value statements can also be incorporated into written documents, reflected in the policies and procedures of the organization, and are further reinforced in the variety of communications between CSRO and volunteer coach. Value congruence is recognized in the iPC framework as integral to creating a positive work environment; our multiple case study revealed incongruencies, as such CSRO managers are encouraged to reflect on their own values, how they are communicated, and how they are lived by themselves and other club representatives. Subscribe to JPRA
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.