Physical Activity Promotion in North Carolina: Perceptions of Public Park and Recreation Directors
Keywords:barriers, health priorities, physical activity, recreation directors, perceptions, attitudes
AbstractThe contributions of regular physical activity to health and well-being are well-documented. Although a logical connection exists between physical activity promotion and parks and recreation, the role of public parks and recreation settings has been acknowledged only recently by public health professions. Further, one study showed that the majority of city managers across the U.S. believed that parks and recreation departments should be the primary governmental agency addressing the obesity and overweight problem. Despite the increasing recognition of the growing role of parks and recreation, a number of questions remain unanswered about how park and recreation programs are central to physical activity promotion within communities. The purpose of this study was to assess the perceptions of public park and recreation directors concerning physical activity in their communities. The entire population of 216 park and recreation directors in North Carolina were surveyed in May 2007 to determine (a) how park and recreation directors perceived their citizen and political support surrounding physical activity; (b) perceived barriers to being more effective in providing physical activity opportunities, and (c) priorities for the future. Differences within these research questions were also examined based on the type of community (e.g., rural/urban). One hundred and thirty four usable questionnaires were returned yielding a response rate of 64%. The majority of directors (98%) felt that their citizens valued opportunities for physical activity, but less than half of the directors (48%) felt their residents would be willing to pay for additional physical activity amenities. In relation to health disparities, the results showed that directors targeted major efforts toward older adults with less effort focused on adults with disabilities and chronic health issues as well as teens at risk of obesity. Directors perceived that staff related issues, funding, and the quality of facilities and equipment were the most significant barriers. They identified engaging in partnerships and providing a greater diversity of programs as their most significant future priorities. Differences between rural and urban communities were also examined with rural directors perceiving less community support than urban directors. This finding was troubling given the health disparities and documented health related issues that face rural populations more than urban communities Although this study was limited to one state, the results provide a useful foundation for understanding the role of parks and recreation in addressing physical activity opportunities within communities.?
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.