The Relationship Between Experiences Sought, Preferred Settings, Resource Conditions, and Management Preferences in an Urban-Proximate Recreation Area
Keywords:outdoor recreation, experiences, settings, preferences, resource conditions, management, urban-proximate
AbstractThis study examined the nature of the visitor experience in an urban-proximate recreation area using measures of experiences sought, setting preferences, perceptions of resource conditions, and perceptions of facility and program development priorities. This advances the research related to visitor preferences by looking not only at desired experiences, but also at how these experience preferences influence the way visitors view the recreation setting including the physical environment, social conditions, current management conditions, and prospective management actions.The study used an on-site survey for initial data collection. Respondents were also given a questionnaire to mail back later. Dillman’s (2000) mail survey procedure was generally followed. Findings demonstrate that visitors seek a variety of recreation experiences in urban-proximate recreation areas, including natural, educational, social, and physical experiences. The experience preferences of visitors partly determined their perceptions of resource conditions and setting preferences. As well, experience preferences and perceptions of resource conditions predicted preferences regarding facility and program development. In general, those seeking natural experiences preferred remote, uncrowded, and undeveloped areas. Visitors who sought educational experiences had no clear setting preferences, but did support development of added facilities and programs, especially those related to interpretation and environmental education. Social experience seekers had no strong setting preferences and seemed to be indifferent to facility and program development. Those seeking a physical experience preferred predominately remote settings for their experiences and appeared to have no preferences for any kind of facility or program development except additional motorized facilities.Managers can use this information to direct users to different areas of the resources depending on the experiences and settings they prefer. This research further demonstrates both theoretical and managerial applications of using desired experiences to help guide recreation resource management. The four experience preference constructs are related to perceptions of resource conditions, setting preferences, and to management actions, though actions tend to be better predicted by resource setting condition perceptions. Continued research about the relationship between experiences and preferences will help recreation managers meet the needs of visitors and determine development policies in an appropriate and strategic manner.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.