The Nature and Extent of Collaboration Between Park and Recreation Agencies and Higher Education Institutions
Keywords:Collaboration, park and recreation departments, higher education institutions, engagement, partnerships.
AbstractIt has long been recognized that collaboration between higher education institutions and community organization has the potential to create win-win situations with both accruing significant benefits. The park and recreation field seems to be particularly well-suited to take advantage of collaborative benefits given the proliferation of academic programs over the past 20 years, along with a subsequent increase in curricula-based field work such as practical, service learning based courses, and student internships. However, despite these potential benefits, collaboration is often viewed as time consuming and difficult to maintain.This paper explores the nature and extent of university-community collaboration in the park and recreation field. A total of 800 recreation practitioners and 411 faculty were asked to rate the importance of 31 areas of collaboration for the field. For each area, subjects were asked whether they were actively collaborating with practitioners or faculty. Respondents to the survey included 307 practitioners (39%) and 174 faculty (42%), for an overall response rate of 40%. Results indicated that 24 of the 31 areas of collaboration were rated at least “somewhat important” for the field of park and recreation. Collaboration on internships, pre-internships, and service learning were the most important areas, as was interaction at conferences and professional workshops. Using park and recreation agencies for field-based research, using practitioners as guest speakers in academic classes, offering/taking advantage of continuing education/professional development opportunities at colleges and universities, and using the park and recreation agency to enhance teaching opportunities were also rated as important for the field. More than half of the subjects in this study reported actively collaborating in these areas. Results revealed that past collaboration was a significant predictor of future intent to collaborate (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences between ratings of importance and performance for any of the 31 areas of collaboration listed. However, less than half of the respondents reported that they were actively collaborating on specific research and evaluation projects, even while reporting that these types of collaborations were somewhat important for the field as a whole. Finally, faculty generally rated collaboration as more important than practitioners, with 17 of the 31 areas of collaboration showing significant differences between the groups (p<0.05).
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.