Applying the Nominal Group Technique to Recreation Planning on Public Natural Areas
Keywords:nominal group technique, collaborative planning, stakeholder involvement, recreation planning, public natural areas
AbstractThroughout the United States, there is a general consensus that public land management agencies need to involve their constituents and stakeholders in the planning and management of public natural areas (Schuett, Selin, & Carr, 2001; Webler, Tuler, & Krueger, 2001). However, exactly what that role should be and how to best involve the public remain controversial (Webler et al., 2001). Despite the uncertainty, there are a variety of approaches available to public land planners and managers to help incorporate stakeholders into recreation decision-making; and depending on the planning objectives, different techniques are appropriate at different times.The purpose of this paper is to describe and demonstrate the value of the nominal group technique as a means to effectively and efficiently incorporate stakeholders into a public land management agency’s recreation planning process. The technique is especially useful for idea generation and is often applied during exploratory phases of research, helping planners, managers, and researchers engage selected stakeholders in productive dialogue (Meffe, Nielsen, Knight, & Schenborn, 2002) to generate ideas to help guide future recreation management decisions and program development (Delbecq, Van de Ven, & Gustafson, 1975).Similar in format to a focus group, the nominal group technique is essentially an organized discussion with a small group of participants (9-12) designed to generate and prioritize ideas about a particular topic (Siemer, Connelly, Brown, & Decker, 2001). However, the meeting results in a prioritized list of meeting participants’ preferred alternatives. Compared with other stakeholder involvement methods (e.g., focus groups, surveys), the nominal group technique requires little financial and staff resources. It also allows planners to work with a larger, more diverse group of stakeholders than focus groups. However, as with other qualitative methods, one of the biggest limitations of the technique is that it is not designed to be representative of a larger community or population (Delbecq et al., 1975; Siemer et al., 2001). Furthermore, due to the meeting’s rather rigid structure, a trained and competent facilitator is needed to effectively implement the technique (Delbecq et al., 1975). To provide public land planners and managers with a practical example of implementing nominal groups in a recreation planning process, the paper details the use of the nominal group technique as an aid in recreation planning for public lands in Florida. In an attempt to better integrate recreation into its planning process, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission wanted input from community stakeholders, and the nominal group technique was used to gather this input. Stakeholders included both traditional and potential user and interest groups of seven wildlife management areas across the state. Results from each of the seven? nominal group meetings were used to help establish a direction for planning and identify potential recreation opportunities stakeholders desired and believed were appropriate for the area. As an example, results from an individual meeting are discussed to show how individual land managers can obtain specific information about their stakeholders’ recreation priorities. Also, the results of the seven meetings were combined, and those results are discussed to highlight how nominal group meetings can be used to provide an overall direction for agency planning.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.