Extending Importance-Performance Analysis with Benefit-Based Segmentation
Keywords:Importance-Performance analysis, benefit-based segmentation, recreation experience preferences, campers
AbstractFor decades, the motives and benefits sought by outdoor recreation participants have been of interest to recreation managers and researchers. Understanding visitors’ socio-psychological recreation experience dimensions affords management opportunities to provide more satisfying recreational experiences. Two methodological and conceptual approaches to understand motives and benefits are benefit-based segmentation and Importance-Performance (I-P) analysis. In this project, both approaches were used to understand visitors and their preferences at a frequently visited USDA Forest Service recreation area. Over a one-year period, contacts were made with campers at developed and dispersed campsites. The contacts were followed by a mail questionnaire. These procedures resulted in a 67.0% response rate and 402 usable questionnaires. First, 15 recreation experience preferences (benefits sought) were used in a principal components analysis to establish user groups. Next, cluster analysis of four factors resulted in three clusters (a) Nature Relaxers, (b) Area Enthusiasts, and (c) Passive Visitors, which were compared with a multivariate analysis of variance. As a final analysis step, I-P measures were analyzed according to the groups to determine significant patterns. Results showed there was a significant omnibus MANOVA for the importance attributes, but not for the performance attributes. Importance attributes differing between the three clusters were areas for large groups, natural setting, signs posting general information, and signs posting regulations. Attribute distributions for the three I-P cluster grids were similar, but no two were identical. Adequate distance among campers, adequate parking, control of discourteous users, signs posting general information, signs posting regulations, and unable to see adjacent campers floated among the grids. In general, those attributes oriented toward site conditions were more likely to fall in the “concentrate here” quadrant than facility attributes. Results suggest that applying I-P measures to benefit-based segmentation can enhance analysis. This study supports previous research suggesting that I-P analysis requires statistics beyond placing attributes on grids. Further, managers can improve site design, planning, and visitor information with visitor benefit-based segmentation. Subtle differences among clusters may be ignored or altogether missed without attention to market segments and decisions based on homogeneous groups may be inappropriate.?
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.