Animating Recreation Experiences through Face-to-Face Leadership: Efficacy of Two Models
AbstractDespite over a century of recognition of the potential impact of recreation leadership on experiences and development of participants, few attempts have been made to integrate knowledge about human motivation, learning, and experience into specific strategies for “animating” activities (i.e., putting an activity into motion and sustaining the action over the course of the experience; Rossman, 1995). In response to the need for this integration, an experiment was conducted to determine the effects of different behavioral science-based models of leading a recreation activity on pleasure, self-efficacy, ego-protective attributions, and creativity. The two models were the COMPLEX model (Ellis, Morris, & Trunnell, 1995) and a model proposed by Bishop and Jeanrenaud (1991), each of which specify a sequence of behaviors that leaders can use to create targeted outcomes. Participants consisted of 73 undergraduate university students, and the recreation activity context was storytelling. The activity was conducted under four conditions: (1) COMPLEX model, designed to elicit enjoyment (CE), (2) COMPLEX model, designed to elicit pleasure (CP), (3) Bishop and Jeanrenaud model, directed at facilitating creative production (CR), and, (4) Bishop and Jeanrenaud model, highly directive approach. The HD condition provided a baseline for comparing effects of the other treatments. Results showed that use of the CE, CP, and CR models promoted pleasure and self-efficacy level. Implications of these results for recreation leadership include the following:1) Use novelty at the beginning of an activity to generate interest.2) Increase participants’ confidence in their ability to successfully participate in the activity by modeling the activity and pointing out that people who are much like them usually are successful.3) Keep participants involved in the activity by increasing or decreasing the complexity of the activity (change rules, add or delete ingredients, reformulate teams, etc.).4) During the course of the activity, use verbal persuasion messages that are personalized (e.g., “You are good at this!”) rather than ambiguous (e.g., “Nice job!”).5) Feedback during the course of the activity that encourages divergent thinking can be used to promote pleasure and self-efficacy (e.g., “What are some other ways of doing this?”).6) If your intent is to help individuals learn about themselves through an activity, consider edifying the activity through processing. During or after the activity (as appropriate), you might ask such questions as “What is the most important thing you learned about yourself while doing this activity?” or “Before we started this activity, did you expect to be successful? Why or why not?”
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.