Theory, Program, and Outcomes: Assessing the Challenges of Evaluating At-Risk Youth Recreation Programs
Keywords:At-risk youth, program evaluation
AbstractThis paper discusses the need to further develop the theoretical foundations of park and recreation programming for at-risk youth. Understanding of the theoretical foundations of park and recreation programming is important, as theory aids not only the design of a program but also its evaluation. Outcome evaluations serve as the basis for demonstrating the credibility of park and recreation programming; therefore, it is of interest to both practitioners and researchers to assess the rigor and quality of these evaluations. Using developmental contextualism as a guiding framework, this paper discusses the complexity of evaluation and reviews the current challenges confronting evaluators of at-risk recreation programs. The focus of developmental contextualism on multiple influences for behavior suggests an increased need to consider, define, and describe the essential elements of the recreation context. The behavioral patterns of the recreation context must be conceptually connected to the format and key elements of the program and the projected outcomes. In the case of at-risk populations, accurately defining and assessing the term "at-risk" is essential, as risk may be a characteristic associate with the individual, the family environment, or the neighborhood. How risk is defined, therefore, has important programmatic implications and should enable more concentrated program designs. Sorting out the rationale between program missions oriented toward individual change and those oriented toward societal change is important for directing evaluators to empirical evidence that demonstrates the influence of the recreation program. Despite recent advances attempting to improve program planning (e.g., Benefits-Based Management), evaluations focused on the impact of programs on individuals, or individual change, often lack specificity in the selection of possible program outcomes. This results in numerous broad outcomes rather than the careful analysis of the mechanism of change associated with a particular outcome. Programs intended to result in societal change (e.g., reduction in crime) are particularly difficult to justifY on a scientifically rigorous basis, risk over generalizing the population of at-risk youth, and raise difficult economic and social policy issues. Practitioners and evaluators are encouraged to embrace and explore the complexities of at-risk recreation programming, and to continue to refine program practices to better serve this population.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.