Putting Visitor Capacity in Perspective: A Response to the Capacity Work Group
Keywords:Visitor use planning and management, visitor capacity
AbstractThis paper is a response to the previous article, Capacity Reconsidered: Finding Consensus and Clarifying Differences, by Whittaker, Shelby, Manning, Cole, and Haas. We acknowledge their valuable contribution to the 50-plus-year-old, yet ongoing and intense, dialogue on visitor capacity in parks and related protected areas. In an attempt to build on their synopsis of the current state of knowledge, we offer an alternative summary of key points, with emphasis on information that is needed to put the theoretical/scientific understanding of capacity into practice toward the goal of improved visitor use planning and management. Our “state of knowledge” includes a discussion tracing the evolution of capacity definitions over time, identification of some major milestones in the advancement of the capacity literature, and a section reviewing earlier state of knowledge/review papers on visitor capacity assessment. This part of the paper forms the basis for our subsequent evaluation of the extent to which Whittaker et al. achieved their stated goals of adding clarity, advancing understanding, and guiding application. This assessment recognizes the points of agreement and clarity provided by the authors, and suggests the “differences that remain” essentially revolve around the role of numbers in capacity planning and management. We find consensus in the view that numerical capacities are appropriate and necessary under certain conditions, and when applicable, should be couched within a broader framework including indicators, standards, and management prescriptions. Finally, we describe current efforts among the federal agencies to put the concept of capacity “in its proper and limited place” and work collectively towards good visitor use planning and management.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.