Public Attitudes Toward the Corporate Sponsorship of Park Agencies: The Role of Promotional Activities and Contractual Conditions
Keywords:corporate sponsorships, contracts, promotions, public opinion
AbstractPark agency professionals are increasingly using corporate sponsorships to acquire additional resources. Existing sponsorship literature emphasizes corporate needs and has not explored public attitudes toward such activities. Moreover, sponsorship research has not explored how public preferences for specific contractual conditions and promotional activities relate to overall sponsorship attitudes.This study identified citizen preferences for a range of sponsorship promotional activities and contractual conditions at an urban park agency. A mail questionnaire was sent to a systematic sample of 810 Fairfax County Park Authority (FCPA) magazine subscribers in August, 1998. Respondents were asked to indicate their level of support for corporate sponsorships of park agencies as well as their attitudes toward specific sponsorship contractual conditions and promotional activities. Results indicated that 53% supported, 32% were neutral, and 15% opposed corporate sponsorships of public park agencies. Specifically, sponsorships with local companies, monetary sponsorships, and sponsorships of free programs were perceived most favorably.Support for park sponsorships was regressed against 21specific contractual conditions and promotional activities. Citizen attitudes toward nationally based companies, corporate names in the title of FCPA special events, the use of three or more sponsors, an exchange of supplies, sponsorships lasting more than one year, and corporate logos on inside banners/signs were positively and significantly related to their overall level of sponsorship support. Citizens who preferred national sponsors and the use of many sponsors were also most likely to be the most supportive of corporate sponsorships in general. Consistent with previous literature on corporate managerial preferences, a strong positive relationship was found between the public’s support for park sponsorships and their preference for long-term sponsorship contracts.Since a sizable portion of this sample was either neutral or negative toward sponsorships, metropolitan park agencies should remain conservative when pursuing certain sponsorship activities at the agency-wide level. Park marketing professionals and policy makers should also continue to obtain public feedback concerning sponsorship activities and conditions because of their potential to alter on-site visitor experiences and influence subsequent public support. Further research can build upon this exploratory study by assessing public reactions across different settings and park systems (i.e., nature-based settings, natural resource agencies) and by addressing sponsorship attitudes at specific events, programs, and facilities.?
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.