Changes in Bridger Wilderness Visitors’ Experiences of Crowding and Attitudes toward Management from 1969 to 2010
Keywords:crowding, experience quality, wilderness management, wilderness purism, trends
AbstractResearchers and recreation managers often speculate about whether visitor experiences and attitudes toward management have changed over time, given changes observed in society, recreation, and use of protected areas, but longitudinal studies remain scarce. This paper reports findings of a 2010 replication of seminal wilderness visitor research conducted in 1969 in the Bridger Wilderness, Wyoming, using self-administered exit questionnaires. We examined whether there have been changes in reactions to social conditions (encounters and crowding), agreement with basic purposes and characteristics of wilderness (purism), and support for different recreation management practices. Visitors in 2010 were less purist in their views about most wilderness characteristics and the desire for solitude, but they were more purist regarding stocking nonnative species. However, these differences were small, and purism levels remained quite high. There was no change in the number of selfreported encounters with other groups or the percentage of visitors who reported that the wilderness was too crowded, but 2010 visitors were less supportive of restrictions on use than 1969 visitors. Regression analysis to explore predictors of crowding and management attitudes showed trip length, trip type (private vs. organized group), and age were, with few exceptions, unrelated to crowding or support for different management options. In both years, purism was positively related to support for restrictions on recreational use and negatively related to support for recreational improvements. Purists were more likely to react negatively to different hypothetical encounter scenarios in both years, but less so in 2010 than in 1969. On the other hand, purism showed no relationship to the actual experience of crowding on the current trip. Findings suggest that how questions about crowding are worded (as hypothetical desires vs. actual experience) can significantly affect conclusions about visitor experiences. They also show that relationships traditionally thought to be strong (e.g., between encounters and crowding) may be weakening over time.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.