What Gets Plans Off the Shelf? A Case Study of Municipal Recreation Plan Implementation
Keywords:recreation, planning, implementation, municipal
AbstractAs the complexity of municipal recreation administration increases, along with tighter and more competitive funding environments, recreation professionals are increasingly reliant on strategic or master planning initiatives to guide their efforts. Successful planning means getting plans implemented-an agreed-upon universal obstacle in planning. When implementation is considered a process, it recognizes that implementation involves a plan moving from one complex, contentious, and politically charged environment to another. Successful implementation requires that each environment is successfully negotiated such that the plan can be ‘handed off’ to the next environment. Using a case study approach, this research described and analyzed the process of plan implementation in three Ontario municipalities that had recently engaged in a municipal recreation planning process. Data collection included planning documents and interviews (n = 11) with key informants and stakeholders from each municipality. Study findings present a descriptive overview of the planning process for each municipality, followed by a description of the strategic decisions made by key actors as the plan moved through four important spaces in the planning process: the community, the department, city hall, and council chambers. Our findings show that four key decisions points that ultimately impact the implementation of a municipal recreation plan are community engagement, plan scope, collaborations, and council and resident support strategy. While each municipal recreation department confronted these same decision points or ‘baton exchanges’ (Loh, 2012; Pressman & Wildavsky, 1973), departments negotiated them differently, and thus the success of plan implementation varied. The findings of this study suggest that implementation is in fact not a step that is similar to the earlier steps of the planning process; that, in fact strategic implementation-related decisions are (and perhaps must be) made throughout the entirety of the planning process. This study draws research attention back to municipal recreation planning; informs the recreation services literature of the final step of the recreation planning process-implementation and furthers our understanding of plan implementation by contributing to the work of planning scholars.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.