A Structural Model of Camp Director Practices and Outcomes: Does Intention Toward Program Outcomes Matter?
Keywords:Positive youth development, intentionality, camp, program outcomes, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling
AbstractAlthough intentionality has been explored within the camp literature, evidence of the effectiveness of intentionality for producing specific positive youth outcomes is mixed. While some empirical studies have produced findings indicating that intentionality enhanced youth growth and development, other studies have produced the opposite result. This study explored the potential relationship between intention toward program outcomes and corresponding parent observed outcomes resulting from the camp experience. A sample of 13 camp directors and the 2,952 parents they served completed surveys exploring the relationships between camp practices and youth development outcomes. The director survey included questions about their levels of camp industry experience, education level, practices related to intentionality and youth outcome achievement, staff training strategies, staff return rate, and staff characteristics. The parent survey included questions about parent and child demographics as well as parent perceptions of their child’s growth and skill development as a result of the camp experience. After confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) verified the reliability and validity of the outcomes measure, the hypothesized relationships were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) to determine if camp director intention had a meaningful influence on growth as a result of the camp experience. The study findings suggest that intentional targeting of outcomes in many instances does not make a meaningful difference in observed developmental outcomes. Out of five program outcomes measured (i.e., communication, responsibility, self-regulation, attitude, and exploration), no outcomes were meaningfully influenced by director intentionality. Additionally, director practices, including staff adaptation of programs, youth engagement, youth-leading activities, and youth involvement in the design of activities, had no statistically or practically meaningful moderational influence on observed growth as a result of attending camp. However, in spite of these somewhat contradictory findings, positive and meaningful pre-to-post camp growth was noted in all outcomes of interest (e.g., communication, responsibility, self-regulation, attitude, and exploration), suggesting that the unique context residential summer camp provides may be the greatest influence on youth socio-emotional growth. This study makes an important contribution to the body of empirical evidence about the relationship between director intentionality and positive youth development. Limitations, study relevance, and future directions are explored.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.