Special Issue on Ethics
AbstractWhy would anyone want to be a therapeutic recreator? The salaries, prestige, job security or public recognition do not provide compelling rationale. Because the jobs are not particularly competitive in these ways, there must be other reasons. Perhaps a more compelling rationale could be found by examining the mission, or values perceived to be present in the field. From my experience it is easy to find practitioners who tend to be more concerned with values than personal betterment; people who are typically more concerned with what they are doing to advance the interests of their clients than their health insurance, retirement plan or even salary scale. In a general sense, I read our history in this way and am convinced that without this strong values orientation, there would be no unifying theme to compel a neophyte to join this profession. This orientation to service is not however sufficient. Nurses care, lawyers care, social workers care, teachers care and so do all the other people who work on behalf of others in the fields of education, rehabilitation and human service. Caring, in and of itself, idealism or humanitarianism are therefore not sufficient. It is not that therapeutic recreators care, for we observe everyone has the option to care, regardless of their field; rather it is the way the profession acts and thinks. Assuming that professional behavior is thoughtful, we can better understand what the profession cares about or values by studying how its members behave. It is this study of professional behavior, typically achieved through study of actual case reports from the field, that raises the fundamental question of "ought." These arc the questions of interest in moral philosophy and professional ethics. Given a choice, what is the "right" action? To answer this question within the dynamics of a profession one needs to know more than what he/she personally believes is the "right" action ... they need to know what their colleagues, as a collective body, consider to be "right." This question of "rightness" is instructive to the thinking that directs professional behavior. Within the context of therapeutic recreation one asks, is it "right" to require people to participate in recreation? And if so, under what circumstances and toward what end? Such questions, when raised by a knowing practitioner take on special meaning. They are not easy to answer and because they are situationally specific, seem new each time they are encountered. This special Therapeutic Recreation Journal focuses attention on these questions of ought. Articles examine some current thinking about ethics and point to an agenda designed to help us to better understand what we need to do to advance knowledge with respect to professional ethics and moral ph ilosophy. The articles selected represent a broad view of the profession. Since this is the first publication in the field exclusively devoted to the topic of professional ethics, an effort was made to provide both scope and depth on pertinent issues. In point of fact it may well represent the first collection of writings on the topic of professional ethics within the entire recreation park and leisure field. As Guest Editor, I wish to acknowledge the support from the editorial staff with special recognition to Editor Peter Witt and Associate Editors, Peg Connolly, Rich MacNeil and Andy Weiner, who assisted with the review and final editing of manuscripts.
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Therapeutic Recreation Journal, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Therapeutic Recreation Journal to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Therapeutic Recreation Journal, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact Sagamore-Venture for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.