Perspectives on Work/Life Balance: An Interview with Heather Carpenter

Authors

  • Jennifer A. Wade-Berg

Abstract

In today’s economy, the need to sustain a livable wage is paramount as individuals struggle to find lasting and meaningful work. Interestingly, this struggle has reignited the conversation pertaining to work/life balance, for both men and women, even in the halls of the academy. Nancy R. Lockwood (2003) stated, “the genesis of work/life balance can be defined as a state of equilibrium in which the demands of both a person’s job and personal life are equal” (p. 3). Chittenden and Ritchie (2011) defined work/life balance more broadly as “maintaining an overall sense of harmony in life” (p. 870). In the academy, the notion that academia affords its faculty with more flexibility prevails. However, with growing demands by University administrations and their governing bodies to prove student learning and to increase research productivity while simultaneously serving the universities and the broader communities, attention has returned to the kinds of human resource policies and procedures that can allow work/life balance to be achieved, especially for women and those caring for young children.

The field of Nonprofit Management and Leadership studies is not immune to this struggle. Newly degreed academicians in the field are more aware of the requirements to gain tenure and promotion but rarely get advice or information on how to navigate this process while trying to maintain a balance with home and family life. This may lead many, especially those in their early career, into a dichotomous lifestyle: One that keeps work and life separate. To some degree, this separation is the antithesis of what many European societies, as well as more evolved U.S. companies like Home Depot, Google, and Apple, advocate. In a recent report, the Center for American Progress and the UC Hastings College of the Law called for promoting workplace flexibility; legislating short-term and extended time off; providing good quality, subsidized child and adult care; and addressing discrimination against employees with family responsibilities. These types of policies and procedures are often catalysts that can “contribute to improved morale, retention,” and productivity (Chittenden & Ritchie, 2011, p. 871).

To examine the demands of the academy, new Assistant Professor Dr. Heather Carpenter was interviewed in July 2012. Questions derived from the work of Chittenden and Ritchie (2011) and Lockwood (2003) allowed parallels to be drawn along with advice for those entering into the field.

Issue

Section

Articles